Abstract
In current practice, the behavior of Machine-Learned Components (MLCs) is not sufficiently specified by the predefined requirements. Instead, they “learn” existing patterns from the available training data, and make predictions for unseen data when deployed. On the surface, their ability to extract patterns and to behave accordingly is specifically useful for hard-to-specify concepts in certain safety critical domains (e.g., the definition of a pedestrian in a pedestrian detection component in a vehicle). However, the lack of requirements specifications on their behaviors makes further software engineering tasks challenging for such components. This is especially concerning for tasks such as safety assessment and assurance. In this position paper, we call for more attention from the requirements engineering community on supporting the specification of requirements for MLCs in safety critical domains. Towards that end, we propose an approach to improve the process of requirements specification in which an MLC is developed and operates by explicitly specifying domain-related concepts. Our approach extracts a universally accepted benchmark for hard-to-specify concepts (e.g., “pedestrian”) and can be used to identify gaps in the associated dataset and the constructed machine-learned model.
Mona Rahimi
Assistant Professor of Software Engineering
AI Engineering, AI-based Software Engineering, Software Evolution, Requirements Engineering, Safety Assurance